Log in | Sign Up

Attorney General Raoul Files U.S. Supreme Court Brief Defending States’ Right To Protect Public Health

Illinois AG joins 18 attorneys general in filing amicus brief arguing federal pesticide law should not block state failure-to-warn claims.

Submitted by Office of the Illinois Attorney General
Save
Listen to the story

CHICAGO -Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined a multistate coalition of 18 attorneys general on Wednesday in filing an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, a case that could have sweeping implications for states’ ability to provide access to justice for those injured by pesticide manufacturers.

Get The Latest News!

Don't miss our top stories and need-to-know news everyday in your inbox.

Sign in to hide this notification.

In their brief, Raoul and the coalition urge the Supreme Court to preserve longstanding state laws that allow those who have been wronged by pesticide manufacturers to seek justice. These laws are an essential tool to protect consumers because they encourage manufacturers to adequately warn about potential health risks posed by their products.

Article continues after sponsor message
Reach Your Local Community with Us - advertise today!

“Limiting the ability of injured consumers to seek justice through the court system is un-American and only rewards large corporations for failing to warn the public about the potential dangers of their products,” Raoul said. “I will continue to advocate for the rights of consumers to pursue justice under the law.”

Monsanto v. Durnell centers on whether federal pesticide law overrides, or “preempts,” state law claims alleging that manufacturers failed to warn consumers about potential dangers associated with their products. The case arises out of litigation over whether the pesticide manufacturer Monsanto was obligated to warn consumers of the risk that using the pesticide Roundup might increase their risk of developing cancer. Monsanto argues that the federal government’s decision to approve Roundup for sale without such a warning precludes states from permitting juries to consider tort claims that such a warning was required.

In their brief, Raoul and the coalition argue that Congress never intended to eliminate state tort law protections, that state tort law helps further Congress’ intent to protect human and environmental health, and that preempting state tort law would wrongfully take decisions away from states and juries.

Joining Raoul in filing this brief are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin.

Prefer RiverBender on Google
Copyright 2026 Riverbender.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More like this:

Attorney General Raoul Defends Temporary Protected Status For Somali Nationals
Apr 19, 2026
Attorney General Raoul Presents Fiscal Year 2027 Budget To Legislators
Apr 8, 2026
Durbin Calls On Supreme Court To Reject Georgia-Pacific’s Attempt To Use Bankruptcy Maneuver To Evade Accountability To Asbestos Victims
Mar 28, 2026
Attorney General Raoul Defends Program For Blind Americans From Federal Overreach
3 days ago
Attorney General Raoul Secures Critical Win As Court Orders Halt In Nextstar, Tegna Merger
Apr 21, 2026

 

Menu

Follow Us

Copyright © 2026 RiverBender.com All rights reserved.

primary

Privacy Policy | Editorial Policy | Fulfillment Policy