Letter To Editor,
As a prominent 90-year-old in the community of Alton, you’re probably wondering what I have to say about late-night liquor licenses. Well, I’m glad you asked! As a very active voting resident, I’ve supported many mayors and elected officials in our community. As a retired small business owner and caterer, my heart is deeply connected to the success of small businesses, and I am honored to be perceived as a living legacy here in Alton.
Don't miss our top stories and need-to-know news everyday in your inbox.
However, in reference to the late-night liquor licenses, I believe it is crucial to take a step back and consider the facts and the broader implications of this decision.
First, let’s address the reality of the situation: out of the 16 bars that have late-night liquor licenses in Alton, only 11 are actively utilizing the late-night liquor license, and many of those do not consistently operate until 3 AM. In fact, several close their doors by 2 AM. This inconsistency raises an important question: are we truly jeopardizing the livelihood of our local businesses, or are we overreacting to a situation that affects only a handful?
Additionally, the notion that businesses would avoid coming to Alton due to the resolution regarding late-night liquor licenses is nothing short of far-fetched. Businesses that consider establishing themselves in any community conduct thorough demographic analyses, and the presence or absence of a late-night liquor license is typically not a deciding factor.
Recently, someone in an article questioned Councilwoman Rosetta Brown’s decision to vote in favor of revoking the late-night liquor license, particularly given her pursuit of a state-level political position. It is important to recognize that her political aspirations should not influence her duty to vote in the best interest of our city. I commend her for not allowing her journey toward a higher office to interfere with her commitment to what she believes is best for Alton.
The focus should not solely be on the potential loss of late-night revenue. While it’s commendable to show support for local businesses, we must also recognize that the elimination of late-night licenses may not be as devastating as it seems. The voices of only two or three taverns—like Bubba & Sissy's and Danny's Lounge—have been prominently featured, but where are the others? The silence from the majority indicates that this change may not impact them as significantly as some would lead us to believe.
Moreover, the City Council has a difficult job to do. The decision to eliminate the late-night licenses is not made in haste but is a strategic move to prioritize the safety and well-being of our community. As someone whose late husband walked the beat in downtown Alton as a police officer, I understand the importance of addressing crime and the need for strong leadership in our city.
It is also worth noting that making decisions based on personal ambitions or future political aspirations undermines the integrity of elected officials. Our aldermen and women must act in the best interests of their constituents, not out of concern for their next campaign.
In closing, I urge my fellow residents to take a moment to pause and seek understanding rather than jumping on the emotional bandwagon. Conversations with our elected officials can illuminate the complexities of this issue. I stand in solidarity with the city leaders, advocating for the safety of our community while encouraging local businesses to explore how they can thrive within the hours they are permitted.
Let us work together to find solutions that benefit everyone in Alton.
Sincerely,
Anita Holman-Banks
Opinions expressed in this section are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of RiverBender.com or its affiliates. We provide a platform for community voices, but the responsibility for opinions rests with their authors.