Log in | Sign Up

Letter Writer Phil Chapman: Killing a New Born: Murder?

Save
Listen to the story

According to Federal Law, it appears a new born baby has a right to life. The foundation for a ‘new borns' right to, life’ is laid in the Declaration of Independence and later affirmed in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. Constitutional law, stipulates no state can abrogate a citizen’s right to life. Killing a child after birth may be seen as murder.

The Declaration of Independence states; “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal , that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness….That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men.” It remains the government’s purpose to secure and preserve citizens’ lives.

Get The Latest News!

Don't miss our top stories and need-to-know news everyday in your inbox.

Sign in to hide this notification.

From the beginning of our nation all citizens enjoyed a ‘natural right' to life. The Fifth Amendment, enshrined in the ‘Bill of Rights’, strongly echoes the Declaration’s intent. It reads; “no person can be deprived of life….without due process of law”. Hence, we pause and ask; is a 'new born' a person? If so, is a new born also a citizen of the United States?

The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution provides clear legal answers. It reads; “all persons born in the United States, are subject to the jurisdiction thereof, and are citizens of the United States.” Clearly, ‘a new born’ is both a person and a citizen of the United States.

Article continues after sponsor message
Limited spots available - advertise with us today!

One might then ask; can a state allow a mother and medical team to consult and then kill a new born? The Fourteenth Amendment provides a clear answer. It reads; ‘No state shall make or abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States.’ This phrase indicates the new born has immunities and privileges which come with citizenship which include a ‘natural right to life’. The Fourteenth Amendment continues; “nor shall any state deprive any person of life….without due process of law.” If my understanding of the amendments is correct, it is clear as surgical scissors in a doctor’s hand poised to rip a baby’s spine, that that ‘new born’ enjoys a right to ‘due process of law’ and an ‘immunity’ against killing that comes with American citizenship no mother and medical team may disregard.

If the state intends to take the child’s life through due process, then please tell me: what crime warranting the ‘death penalty’ did the baby commit?

Respectfully,

Phil Chapman

Prefer RiverBender on Google
Copyright 2026 Riverbender.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More like this:

Senate, House Democrats File Brief To Supreme Court Defending Birthright Citizenship Against Trump Attacks
Feb 24, 2026
Tiananmen Square Crackdown Leads June 4’s Most Significant Moments in History
2 days ago
On May Day, Governor JB Pritzker Reaffirms Commitment To Illinois Workers
May 4, 2026
May 19 in History: Anne Boleyn’s Execution to the Dark Day in New England
May 19, 2026
Durbin Statement On Supreme Court Decision In Louisiana V. Callais
May 2, 2026

 

Menu

Get the RiverBender App

Follow Us

Copyright © 2026 RiverBender.com All rights reserved.

primary

Privacy Policy | Editorial Policy | Fulfillment Policy