WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court declined to intervene Tuesday in a dispute over a Biden-era immigration regulation that allowed immigration judges to pause some deportation proceedings.

The high court turned down a request from Democratic-led cities who say the rule was used to help crime victims and neglected juveniles and should be revived.

Get The Latest News!

Don't miss our top stories and need-to-know news everyday in your inbox.

Sign in to hide this notification.

Texas and the Trump administration agreed to a court order blocking the regulation after the state sued. Texas alleged that the practice called administrative closure was dramatically expanded under former President Joe Biden and effectively allowed people to stay in the country indefinitely.

Article continues after sponsor message

The cities of Baltimore, Columbus, Ohio and New Haven, Connecticut, along with the legal group Centro Legal de la Raza, had asked to join the case to defend the regulation. They filed an emergency appeal before the Supreme Court after a judge refused to allow them to intervene.

Represented by the group Democracy Forward, they argued that Texas and the Trump administration had worked together to allow the regulation to be permanently blocked in court, bypassing a public rulemaking process.

The Justice Department had urged the justices to deny the appeal, saying the cities had no legal standing to challenge the settlement and they had not shown they'd suffer immediate legal harm.

 

More like this:

Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homes
Oct 19, 2026
Life at the top isn't easy as BYU becomes the latest top-2 team to lose to an unranked opponent
3 days ago
Keyone Jenkins throws TD pass in double OT and UCF knocks off No. 2 BYU 39-31
3 days ago
Thousands gather in Paris after a court lifts a protest ban despite fears of new violence
5 days ago
New York man shot by ICE officers appears in immigration court
Oct 15, 2026